Categorial features of political vs. Religious discourses: linguo-semiotic analysis
| Autor | Natalia A. Bozhenkova - Pavel A. Katyshev - Darya V. Atanova - Raisa K. Bozhenkova |
| Cargo | Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, 'Pushkin State Russian Language Institute' - Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, 'Pushkin State Russian Language Institute' - Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Southwest State University» - Federal State Budgetary ... |
| Páginas | 456-476 |
Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito
Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba
V. 9 - Nº 04 - Ano 2020
ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index
456
CATEGORIAL FEATURES OF POLITICAL VS. RELIGIOUS
DISCOURSES: LINGUO-SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS
Natalia A. Bozhenkova
1
Pavel A. Katyshev
2
Darya V. Atanova
3
Raisa K. Bozhenkova
4
Abstract: The article offers a
comparative description of iconic
constituents of religious and political
discourses as the most complex and
symbolically saturated types of
institutional interaction. The research is
based on a systemic multi-level analysis
of the component structure of discourse
in order to identify and characterize
linguistic and sociocultural constants
and markers of semasiologically holistic
polycode practices combined by certain
axiological attitudes. The
methodological concept aimed at
modeling institutional interactions made
it possible to characterize the methods
and mechanisms of explication and
transformation of the iconic elements of
1
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education - "Pushkin State
Russian Language Institute"
2
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education - "Pushkin State
Russian Language Institute"
3
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Southwest State
University»
4
Federal State Budgetary Institution Of Higher Professional Education - "Pushkin State
Russian Language Institute"
political/religious communication,
which determine algorithms of verbal-
discursive behavior. The combination of
methods of discourse analysis,
linguistic-cognitive projection and
functional-pragmatic consideration of
textual units of the mentioned spheres of
communication made it possible to
qualify and taxonomize the
linguosemiotic components of discourse
data, which, while receiving a specific
refraction in a socio-communicative
reality, clearly demonstrate the
typological signs of a linguocultural
universe. The results of the study
indicate that, despite the conceptual
contrast between politics and religion,
these types of discursive practices have
Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito
Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Universidade Federal da Paraíba
V. 9 - Nº 04 - Ano 2020
ISSN | 2179-7137 | http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index
457
many correlating features, which are
based on a comparable similarity of
content, mechanisms and methods of
generating discursive constructs,
correlated principles of representation of
mental categories and a definite analogy
of symbolic-symbolic design of a
communication process.
Keywords: political discourse, religious
discourse, socio-and linguocultural
constants, linguocultural signs.
Scientific value
In the scientific paradigm of
contemporary linguistics, where the
object of research is speech
communication in the context of socio-
cultural structures, systematization of the
conceptual foundations of various
approaches of humanitarian knowledge
to the analysis of the discursive practices
of the new information society is the
methodological key to solving many
research problems. The combination of
methods of discourse analysis, linguistic
cognitive projection, modeling of
institutional interactions and functional-
pragmatic consideration of textual units
of political and religious spheres of
communication made it possible to
qualify and taxonomy the semi-
sociological components of discourse
data, which receives a specific refraction
in the socio-communicative reality. The
methodology of a comparative-
typological study of verbal/non-verbal
signs representing the corpus of religious
and political communication can be
extrapolated to other institutional
interactions (both in synchronic and
diachronic aspects) and become the basis
for creating a model of linguosemiotic
space of various mental communities.
Topicality
In the context of a modern
integrated communicative reality, the
problem of explication of typological
mechanisms for organizing interactions,
the determinants of which are the mental
universals of individual/collective
consciousness, occupies a special place.
In this regard, the most complex and
symbolically saturated types of
institutional discourse are political and
religious, having (with the ideological
polarity of politics and religion) quite a
few correlating signs of considerable
interest. Comparative characterization of
iconic constituents of religious and
political discursive practices based on a
systematic multi-level analysis of the
component structure of discourse clearly
Para continuar a ler
PEÇA SUA AVALIAÇÃO